DfID Funds Infrastructure, ‘Best Bets’ for Agriculture in Africa
The UK’s Department for International Development (DfID) has recently launched its new report, entitled “Eliminating World Poverty: Building our Common Future.”
Two implicit dimensions are rreflected in this report’s title. Firstly, the world already has many good solutions for reducing world hunger, but they simply need to be scaled up and funded in order to work at a broader level. Secondly, while many markets are still fragmented and inefficient,these markets are increasingly part of a common globalised economy, in which we all participate.
Two interesting African initiatives highlighted in the report and being funded by DfID are the North-South Transport Corridor and the ‘best bets’ approach to agriculture.
The North-South Transport Corridor is a $1.2 billion project which will upgrade 4,000 kilometres of road and 600 kilometres of rail track. The goal of the project is to free up bottlenecks in shipping and other transport, especially in parts of eastern and southern Africa.
DfID’s ‘best bets’ for agriculture will see funding going to “the innovations with the greatest potential to lift poor people out of poverty, and to getting these into widespread use.” AS DfID sees it, these include:
- tackling new pests which attack staple crops, such as virulent wheat rust and cassava viruses. This will cost £20 million but could help protect almost three billion people who depend on these crops for their food
- breeding drought-resistant maize for Africa. This will cost up to £60 million but will help 320 millino farmers in Africa who are affected by drought and will indirectly benefit many more likely to be affected by climate change.
- improving the vitamin content of staple crops. To develop these crops and get them into widespread use will cost around £80 million but it has the potential to help improve the nutrition of up to 670 million of the poorest people, many of them children.
Tags: Africa, biotechnology, climate change, DfID, drought, infrastructure, principle1, principle3, principle5, principle6








































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Oct 04, 2009
Great information, I will be linking back to you and going to look around at your other posts.
Nov 23, 2010
The article is well presented but has serious misgivings:
1. The North – South 1.2 B$ corridor but is the % benefits to:
1.1 Rural poor with no roads/transport to get produce to markets
1.2 Commercial transporters ferrying farm produce from foreign commercial
farmers farming on African land
2. Wheat rust – very very few rural poor farmers grow this crop in Africa
and what is the %ntage of wheat products in the rural poor diet?
3. Drought resistant maize will no doubt require fertiliser which is not
readily available in rural areas – you should be putting this money
in improving rural farming agricultural practices
4. Staple foods can make sufficient natural vitamins with the correct
agricultural practices
In a nutshell the rural poor benefit little from the monies being provided by DFID – the beneficiaries are too numerous but not the RURAL POOR – they are included just to make it easier to get funding for these grandiose projects with little benefit to the POOR